Skip to main content

The FCC is trying to figure out how much trouble unwanted radio waves really cause

cell towers radio
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The radio spectrum is a mess of different waves surrounding us at all times. But just how much of a mess is it? That’s what the FCC is trying to figure out.

Many radio devices emit waves that could actually interfere with radio services, and the sum of all those interfering waves is called the “radio spectrum noise floor.” The FCC is trying to determine exactly how much that noise floor has changed from human-made devices over the past 20 years.

Many people believe that the noise floor is raised based on the number of devices emitting radio waves. However, the FCC says it hasn’t really found much data to support that idea, but it’s still in the very early stages of its study — so early, in fact, that it asked for public opinion on the parameters of what the study should be just last week.

There are regulations in place regarding how much RF energy devices can produce, but not all devices are regulated in the same way. Moreover, there are plenty of devices that aren’t made to emit radio waves, but do so anyway because of how they work — things like electric motors, light switches, power lines, and so on. These are called “incidental radiators.”

Then, of course, there are devices that are actually designed to emit radio waves, such as smartphones, Bluetooth devices, Wi-Fi routers, and so on. Despite being regulated, sometimes these devices emit waves outside of their specified frequencies, meaning that they contribute to a raised noise floor too.

After describing the idea for the study, the FCC also asked questions, such as what the major sources of noise are, what radio services are affected by a higher noise floor, and so on. At the end, it asked for ideas on how to conduct a study on RF energy noise. If you want to participate, you can submit responses here.

Christian de Looper
Christian’s interest in technology began as a child in Australia, when he stumbled upon a computer at a garage sale that he…
5 smartwatches you should buy instead of the Google Pixel Watch 2
The main workout screen on the Google Pixel Watch 2.

It's no secret that we weren't fans of the first Google Pixel Watch. However, Google heard all the criticism of its smartwatch debut and made amends, coming back with the Google Pixel Watch 2. Its second attempt was much better, adding strong performance, exceptional comfort, and a solid battery life to the fitness tracking of Fitbit. While it still has some issues, it's now a product we can recommend buying.

But just because it's now good doesn't mean there aren't alternatives to be had. There are a number of smartwatches that are better suited for those looking for a longer battery life, a focus on fitness, or a simpler experience. Some are just flat-out better. If you're considering buying a Google smartwatch, you need to know about these five smartwatches you should buy instead of the Google Pixel Watch 2.
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

Read more
I compared Google and Samsung’s AI photo-editing tools. It’s not even close
A person holding the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Google Pixel 8 Pro.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (left) and Google Pixel 8 Pro Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Most phones nowadays are equipped with dual lens or triple lens camera systems and have powerful photo-editing tools baked natively into the software. This means most people have a compact photo-editing suite in their pocket every day.

Read more
The Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Flip 6 release date just leaked
Two Galaxy Z Fold 5 phones next to each other -- one is open and one is closed.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 (left) and Galaxy Z Flip 5 Andrew Martonik / Digital Trends

Samsung is just months away from its next Unpacked event, where it will announce the previously teased Galaxy Ring alongside the next Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip phones. The event, which could have the most number of devices launching at one Samsung event, is set a couple weeks ahead of last year's event.

Read more